Just and unjust wars by Michael Walzer, 1977, Basic Books edition, in English. Are you sure you want to remove Just and unjust wars from your list? Just and unjust wars. Download ebook for print-disabled Prefer the physical book? Check nearby libraries with. https://rawtree517.weebly.com/blog/download-game-bus-simulator-indonesia-id-mod-apk. Mar 20, 2008 - Just and unjust wars. Michael Walzer. Basic books, New York, 1977. El amante lyrics nicky jam. https://realitypowerful660.weebly.com/blog/cool-mac-screensavers-download-free. Download citation. May 15, 2017 - Just and Unjust Wars by Michael Walzer (review); Robert Barry. Of self-defense of an. Access options available: PDF Download PDF.
- Unjust War Theory
- Just And Unjust Wars Sparknotes
- Michael Walser Just And Unjust Wars Pdf Download Full
Just And Unjust Wars
Author : Michael WalzerISBN : 9780465052707
Genre :
Unjust War Theory
Political ScienceFile Size : 54. 88 MB
Format : PDF, Docs
Download : 254
Read : 308
A penetrating investigation into moral and ethical questions raised by war, drawing on examples from antiquity to the present Just and Unjust Wars has forever changed how we think about the ethics of conflict. In this modern classic, political philosopher Michael Walzer examines the moral issues that arise before, during, and after the wars we fight. Reaching from the Athenian attack on Melos, to the Mai Lai massacre, to the current war in Afghanistan and beyond, Walzer mines historical and contemporary accounts and the testimony of participants, decision makers, and victims to explain when war is justified and what ethical limitations apply to those who wage it.
Just And Unjust Wars A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations
Author : Michael WalzerISBN : 0465037054
Genre : History
File Size : 57. 89 MB
Format : PDF, Kindle
Download : 692
Read : 1120
This classic work examines the issues surrounding military theory, war crimes, and the spoils of war from the Athenian attack on Melos to the My Lai massacre. A revised and updated classic treatment of the morality of war written by one of our country's leading philosophers. Just and Unjust Wars examines a variety of conflicts in order to understand exactly why, according to Walzer, 'the argument about war and justice is still a political and moral necessity.' Walzer's classic work draws on historical illustrations that range all the way from the Athenian attack on Melos to this morning's headlines, and uses the testimony of participants-decision makers and victims alike-to examine the moral issues of warfare.
Just And Unjust Wars
Author : Michael WalzerISBN : 1322776644
Genre : War
File Size : 31. 83 MB
Format : PDF, Docs
Download : 876
Read : 1012
'This classic work of political ethics has radically reconfigured the way that we think about war. From the Athenian attack on Melos to the My Lai Massacre, from the wars in the Balkans through the first war in Iraq, Michael Walzer examines the moral issues surrounding military theory, war crimes, and the spoils of war. He studies a variety of conflicts over the course of history, as well as the testimony of those who have been most directly involved--participants, decision makers, and victims. In his introduction to this new edition, Walzer specifically addresses the moral issues surrounding the war in and occupation of Iraq, reminding us once again that 'the argument about war and justice is still a political and moral necessity'--Back cover.
Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists
Author :ISBN :
Genre :
File Size : 35. 23 MB
Format : PDF, Docs
Download : 853
Read : 218
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists is the premier public resource on scientific and technological developments that impact global security. Founded by Manhattan Project Scientists, the Bulletin's iconic 'Doomsday Clock' stimulates solutions for a safer world.
Moral Constraints On War
Author : Bruno CoppietersISBN : 0739104373
Genre : Philosophy
File Size : 53. 48 MB
Format : PDF, ePub
Download : 853
Read : 1099
Moral Constraints on War offers a principle-by-principle presentation of the transcultural roots of the ethics of war in an age defined by the increasingly international nature of military intervention. Parts one and two trace the evolution of Just War theory, analyzing the principles of jus ad bellum and jus in bello: the principles that determine under what conditions a war may be started and then conducted. Each chapter provides the historical background of the principle under discussion, an explanation of the principle, and numerous historical examples of its application. In Part three, case studies apply the theories discussed to the Gulf War, the 1994 Russian intervention in Chechnya, NATO's humanitarian mission in Kosovo, and the U.S. military's actions in Afghanistan in the wake of the World Trade Center attacks. Bringing together an international coterie of philosophers and political scientists this accessible and practical guide offers students of military ethics, international law, and social conflict rich, up-to-the-minute insight into the pluralistic character of Just War Theory.
Intervention Terrorism And Torture
Author : Steven P. LeeISBN : 9781402046780
Genre : Political Science
File Size : 50. 32 MB
Format : PDF
Download : 506
Read : 153
This book asks whether just war theory and its rules for determining when war is justified remains adequate to the challenges posed by contemporary developments. Some argue that the nature of contemporary war makes these rules obsolete. By carefully examining the phenomena of intervention, terrorism, and torture from a number of different perspectives, the essays in this book explore this complex set of issues with insight and clarity.
Just And Unjust Warriors
Author : David RodinISBN : 9780191552731
Genre : Political Science
File Size : 39. 43 MB
Format : PDF, ePub, Docs
Download : 821
Read : 1105
Can a soldier be held responsible for fighting in a war that is illegal or unjust? This is the question at the heart of a new debate that has the potential to profoundly change our understanding of the moral and legal status of warriors, wars, and indeed of moral agency itself. The debate pits a widely shared and legally entrenched principle of war - that combatants have equal rights and equal responsibilities irrespective of whether they are fighting in a war that just or unjust - against a set of striking new arguments. These arguments challenge the idea that there is a separation between the rules governing the justice of going to war (the jus ad bellum) and the rules governing what combatants can do in war (the jus in bello). If ad bellum and in bello rules are connected in the way these new arguments suggest, then many aspects of just war theory and laws of war would have to be rethought and perhaps reformed. This book contains eleven original and closely argued essays by leading figures in the ethics and laws of war and provides an authoritative treatment of this important new debate. The essays both challenge and defend many deeply held convictions: about the liability of soldiers for crimes of aggression, about the nature and justifiability of terrorism, about the relationship between law and morality, the relationship between soldiers and states, and the relationship between the ethics of war and the ethics of ordinary life. This book is a project of the Oxford Leverhulme Programme on the Changing Character of War.
First Things
Author : Hadley ArkesISBN : 069102247X
Genre : Philosophy
File Size : 51. 90 MB
Format : PDF, Mobi
Download : 938
Read : 909
This book restores to us an understanding that was once settled in the 'moral sciences': that there are propositions, in morals and law, which are not only true but which cannot be otherwise. It was understood in the past that, in morals or in mathematics, our knowledge begins with certain axioms that must hold true of necessity; that the principles drawn from these axioms hold true universally, unaffected by variations in local 'cultures'; and that the presence of these axioms makes it possible to have, in the domain of morals, some right answers. Hadley Arkes restates the grounds of that older understanding and unfolds its implications for the most vexing political problems of our day. The author turns first to the classic debate between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas. After establishing the groundwork and properties of moral propositions, he traces their application in such issues as selective conscientious objection, justifications for war, the war in Vietnam, a nation's obligation to intervene abroad, the notion of supererogatory acts, the claims of 'privacy,' and the problem of abortion.
Justice Intervention And Force In International Relations
Author : Kimberly A. HudsonISBN : 9781134009282
Genre : History
File Size : 28. 91 MB
Format : PDF, Mobi
Download : 744
Read : 231
This book analyses the problems of current just war theory, and offers a more stable justificatory framework for non-intervention in international relations. The primary purpose of just war theory is to provide a language and a framework by which decision makers and citizens can organize and articulate arguments about the justice of particular wars. Given that the majority of conflicts that threaten human security are now intra-state conflicts, just war theory is often called on to make judgments about wars of intervention. This book aims to critically examine the tenets of just war theory in light of these changes, and formulate a new theory of intervention and just cause. For Michael Walzer, the leading scholar of just war theory, armed humanitarian intervention is permissible only in cases of genocide, ethnic cleansing, widespread massacres, or enslavement. This book shows why this threshold is too restrictive in light of the progressive shift away from interstate conflict as well as the emerging norms of 'sovereignty as responsibility' and the 'responsibility to protect'. Justice, Intervention and Force in International Relations aims to establish a new, stable foundation for non-intervention and a revised threshold for 'just cause'. In addition, this book demonstrates that over-reliance on the just cause category distorts understanding, analysis, and public discussion of the justice or injustice of resorting to war. This new book will be of much interest to students of ethics, security studies, international relations and international law. Kimberley Hudson is Assistant Professor of Political Science at American International College, and has a Phd in International Relations from Brown University.
Toward A Just World
Author : Dorothy V. JonesISBN : 9780226115818
Genre : Political Science
File Size : 54. 23 MB
Format : PDF, ePub
Download : 800
Read : 358
'Toward a Just World is an insightful and thoughtful history. The first half of the twentieth century and the heroic efforts of those who sought international justice during that time will be much better understood and appreciated thanks to this fascinating book.'—Robert F. Drinan, Georgetown University A century ago, there was no such thing as international justice, and until recently, the idea of permanent international courts and formal war crimes tribunals would have been almost unthinkable. Yet now we depend on institutions such as these to air and punish crimes against humanity, as we have seen in the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the appearance of Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic before the Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Toward a Just World tells the remarkable story of the long struggle to craft the concept of international justice that we have today. Dorothy V. Jones focuses on the first half of the twentieth century, the pivotal years in which justice took on expanded meaning in conjunction with ideas like world peace, human rights, and international law. Fashioning both political and legal history into a compelling narrative, Jones recovers little-known events from undeserved obscurity and helps us see with new eyes the pivotal ones that we think we know. Jones also covers many of the milestones in the history of diplomacy, from the Treaty of Versailles and the creation of the League of Nations to the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal and the making of the United Nations. As newspapers continue to fill their front pages with stories about how to administer justice to al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, Toward a Just World will serve as a timely reminder of how the twentieth century achieved one of its most enduring triumphs: giving justice an international meaning.
Top Download:
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations” as Want to Read:
Rate this book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of Just and Unjust Wars by Michael Walzer.
Not the book you’re looking for?Preview — Just and Unjust Wars by Michael Walzer
From the Athenian attack on Melos to the My Lai Massacre, from the wars in the Balkans through the first war in Iraq, Michael Walzer examines the moral issues surrounding military theory, war crimes, and the spoils of war. He studies a variety of conflicts over the course of history, as well as the testimony of those who have been most directly involved--participants, deci.more
Published July 26th 2006 by Basic Books (first published 1976)
To see what your friends thought of this book,please sign up.
To ask other readers questions aboutJust and Unjust Wars,please sign up.
https://greyyellow192.weebly.com/blog/dropbox-app-crash-mac. Empire earth 2 mac download free. Be the first to ask a question about Just and Unjust Wars https://rawtree517.weebly.com/blog/once-upon-a-time-season-6-free-download.
Books Employed to Greatly Harmful Ends 162 books — 234 voters
Politics 315 books — 424 voters
More lists with this book.
Rating details
|
Jul 26, 2011Hadrian rated it really liked it
An interesting and only too pertinent analysis of the morality of wars. Views on states, the individual soldier, etc. Initially written as a response to Vietnam, but some can very easily compare it to Libya or Afghanistan. Good use of historical examples.
Nov 07, 2010Aaron Crofut rated it it was ok Shelves: political-theory-science, philosophy, war
This book, considered a must read in the field of just war theory, left me unimpressed. Everything is based on a system of morality that is never really explained save for an unexplained theory of rights that people supposedly have under various circumstances. Where do these rights come from?
The short of it is, I'm never going to buy the argument that people attacked have to put their own in harm's way for the sake of the attackers. The agent problem is worth deep consideration (can we hold a p.more
The short of it is, I'm never going to buy the argument that people attacked have to put their own in harm's way for the sake of the attackers. The agent problem is worth deep consideration (can we hold a p.more
Mar 13, 2013Chris Marsh rated it did not like it
I read this as required reading during my second year of studies at West Point. We read this along with Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War.
Although it's subtitle is 'A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations' it does not present a coherent argument. The logic is circular and the argument falls in on itself.
In the end, perhaps Thucydides was right: 'The strong do as they can, while the weak do as they must'
Although it's subtitle is 'A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations' it does not present a coherent argument. The logic is circular and the argument falls in on itself.
In the end, perhaps Thucydides was right: 'The strong do as they can, while the weak do as they must'
May 05, 2014Relstuart rated it it was ok
I thought the initial portion of the book asks some good questions and contains some thought provoking analysis.
However, towards the latter part of the book I found myself disagreeing with the author about the WWII strategic bombing campaign and the use of nuclear devices in Japan. Two general things I did not feel he took into account are the differences in total war vs limited engagement (World war with entire nations using all elements of society to support the war effort vs a fraction of so.more
However, towards the latter part of the book I found myself disagreeing with the author about the WWII strategic bombing campaign and the use of nuclear devices in Japan. Two general things I did not feel he took into account are the differences in total war vs limited engagement (World war with entire nations using all elements of society to support the war effort vs a fraction of so.more
More journalism than philosophy, alternating between mushy and dangerous. Rather than a curb on the conduct of war, it provides rhetorical cover for empire and an extremely useful apology for power. [Notice for instance, G.W. Bush's justification for the invasion of Iraq, drawing on language from Walzer.] It makes no contribution to an understanding of the ethics of war, because it only rehashes the current regime of international law of war. An example of its flimsiness, note how W's reference.more
Jan 28, 2016Sarah (Gutierrez) Myers rated it liked it
Discussions of the justice of war generally make a distinction between jus ad bellum (just war) and jus in bello (justice in the war). In this book, Michael Walzer does not make any great attempt to deal with jus ad bellum; he takes the principle that resistance to aggression is the basis for a just war as his starting point, and the majority of the book is devoted to the rules of war, that is, how to fight justly in war. If you, like me, have doubts about the justice of war, period, or were loo.more
If you read only one book on the morality of war, this should be the one. Walzer is the preeminent modern Just War Theorist, and this is still the definitive text on the subject - even if you don't agree with its entirety. I certainly don't.
If you are an 'absolute pacifist,' you have to answer why it would be morally justifiable to stand and watch the unmitigated horrors of genocide that have gone on throughout history without end other than force of war, and Walzer gives many examples here. Wal.more
If you are an 'absolute pacifist,' you have to answer why it would be morally justifiable to stand and watch the unmitigated horrors of genocide that have gone on throughout history without end other than force of war, and Walzer gives many examples here. Wal.more
Mar 18, 2010FiveBooks rated it it was amazing
Professor Mary Kaldor of LSE has chosen to discuss Michael Walzer’sJust and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations , on FiveBooks as one of the top five on her subject - War , saying that:
“… This is another classic. He is a philosopher and he wrote it after the Vietnam war asking the question – is war ever just?. The just cause nowadays, according to Walzer, is self-defence against aggression…. There is the distinction between the non-combatant and the combatant. Non-com.more
“… This is another classic. He is a philosopher and he wrote it after the Vietnam war asking the question – is war ever just?. The just cause nowadays, according to Walzer, is self-defence against aggression…. There is the distinction between the non-combatant and the combatant. Non-com.more
Interesting
A very popular book on Just War theory although the writing can be less persuasive in later chapters. Still quite educational however. The first chapter made it well worth it.
Sep 11, 2014Maria rated it really liked itA very popular book on Just War theory although the writing can be less persuasive in later chapters. Still quite educational however. The first chapter made it well worth it.
Shelves: usmc-reading-list-2013, history, military, non-fiction, sociology-psychology, audio-books, usmc-reading-list-2017
Walzer examines the ethics of fighting war for countries and for individuals. First published in 1977 he was far kinder to drafted soldiers than their political leaders. With specific historical examples, Walzer leads the reader thru the moral questions of starting, fighting and finishing a war.
Why I started this book: I'm tackling my pile of professional reading and this one was in audio!
Why I finished it: I haven't read many philosophy books and so it took me a while to get use to the languag.more
Why I started this book: I'm tackling my pile of professional reading and this one was in audio!
Why I finished it: I haven't read many philosophy books and so it took me a while to get use to the languag.more
Nov 29, 2018Daniel Moss rated it liked it · review of another edition
The book starts off fine, however, somewhere around page 50 Walzer make the classic mistake of building entire arguments off of a particular abstract starting point - namely, that there is such thing as a social contract entered into between society and state which gives legitimacy and sovereignty to the state. It's a foolish proposition and leads to all kinds of weird bastardized points of view as things get increasingly confused the more you build on the false starting point.
Dec 17, 2018Rose Heartfilia rated it it was ok Shelves: male-narrator, non-fiction, read-in-2018, did-not-finish
So I read this because I wrote an essay about one of his articles. The thing is that he writes a very interesting concept and I would consider writing another essay about it because there are still a lot of questions.
I do have to say what was very annoying were the little stars, in which Walzer keeps explaining something, later on, I always missed them so at the end of the page I was like: oh shit. Also the fact that he kept referring to things in the future: 'I would say this later on in this.more
I do have to say what was very annoying were the little stars, in which Walzer keeps explaining something, later on, I always missed them so at the end of the page I was like: oh shit. Also the fact that he kept referring to things in the future: 'I would say this later on in this.more
Jul 21, 2009Kathryn rated it it was amazing
I began reading this book on July 21, 2009, having borrowed it from my son’s girlfriend; now, on October 14, 2009, I have completed my reading of this book. It was not that I didn’t like the book that took me so long to read it; my problem was that it was a good book that also took concentrated effort to read, and concentrated effort to read was something that was in rather short supply for the past few months. But, I have completed my reading of the book; and, since I got a brand-new copy to re.more
Aug 21, 2014Tim rated it really liked it · review of another edition Shelves: history, philosophy, social-justice, politics
A hardcore philosophy text lightened up with a generous helping of historical examples. The book apparently grew out of the author's experience in the anti-Vietnam War movement, and chapter by chapter, he explores the different aspects of what might make a war just or unjust. Not surprisingly there are a lot of different angles to the problem, from the justice of the conflict itself, to justice in the way it is fought.
Perhaps the deepest section is the first, where he takes seriously our collect.more
Perhaps the deepest section is the first, where he takes seriously our collect.more
This has long been the uber-text of Just War theory, despite being written in 1977, long before the end of the bipolar Cold War and the 21st-century complications of international terrorism and the 'responsibility to protect'. As such, it does read very much like a book form a past era for much of the time, and the publishers have not made a huge effort to update the 4th edition - it has a (short) new preface in which Walzer comes out against regime change of the Iraq sort. The book is superbly.more
Jun 07, 2013Mike Gaeta rated it really liked it
This author pulls from an eclectic group of historical variety regarding what constitutes a just war, and firstly, whether there is such a thing as a just war. From aquinas to JS Mill, it puts into perspective the reasons behind each philosophy in doing so. It's not so much a survey but more so an amalgamation of different views which constitute his own.
Aug 21, 2018Phoenix rated it it was amazing
De Morabilus Bellum - Regarding the Morality of War
Erudite, scholarly, thoughtful and definitively relevant examination of codes of conduct wrt to going to war - jus ad bellum, and conduct in a war - jus in bello. Walzer's personal journey emerged first from his opposition to US actions in Vietnam but led to an examination of the pursuit of war from Thucydides to modernity.
War invites barbarism, breaking both law and permissibility. Against this Walzer notes that circumstances do allow for rules.more
Erudite, scholarly, thoughtful and definitively relevant examination of codes of conduct wrt to going to war - jus ad bellum, and conduct in a war - jus in bello. Walzer's personal journey emerged first from his opposition to US actions in Vietnam but led to an examination of the pursuit of war from Thucydides to modernity.
War invites barbarism, breaking both law and permissibility. Against this Walzer notes that circumstances do allow for rules.more
When I was in college, my major was Peace, War, and Defense. One of the required courses for the major was called 'Philosophy of Peace, War, and Defense. Sadly, this book was not on our reading list. I assume it was because of when I was in college (mid 90s). Due to the end of the Cold War but yet before 9/11, our main philosophical discussion was on the democratization of other countries as a way to a permanent peace.
But this book doesn't really delve into that, it's main concern in interplay.more
But this book doesn't really delve into that, it's main concern in interplay.more
An important book. Few will come away agreeing with everything that Walzer has to say, but his arguments are so compelling-and his command of military history so formidable-that one's beliefs about the morality of war are certain to be refined if not wholly reconsidered by the end.
Generally, Walzer attributes too much significance to the meaningful nature of the national community and fails to consider the psychological or emotive appeal of violence in war. These are really my only two major ob.more
Generally, Walzer attributes too much significance to the meaningful nature of the national community and fails to consider the psychological or emotive appeal of violence in war. These are really my only two major ob.more
Just And Unjust Wars Sparknotes
Oct 31, 2017Tom Schulte rated it really liked it · review of another edition
I read a lot of history. I figure, conservatively, I have read hundreds of nonfiction histories. From my own assessment, I doubt in cost of human life (potential), wealth-'blood and treasure'-that no more human expenditure has been made than that of warring of one group upon another. To what end? Written in reaction to the Vietnam war, this considered and though-provoking work is an overview of war and war situations decided from Thucydides to Vietnam and considering the morality of each. Consid.more
It's not normal for me to take over a month to read just 300 pages, so that prefaces how difficult it was for me to finish this book.
This is a textbook, glorified. I found that towards the end the author used 'I' too much, and that made this lose its credibility imo.
Would I recommend? Not really, unless you need something to help you fall asleep.
This is a textbook, glorified. I found that towards the end the author used 'I' too much, and that made this lose its credibility imo.
Would I recommend? Not really, unless you need something to help you fall asleep.
May 28, 2017Arvin Pamplona rated it really liked it
Good read if you have a general knowledge of Aquinas and just war theory.
This book would have been better had Walzer not been so confusing. Many of his ideas were interesting and understandable yet hard to understand because of his writing style
Essential book of you are interested in the
ethics of warfare.
ethics of warfare.
(fine for what it is, but i am not the target reader)
Michael Walser Just And Unjust Wars Pdf Download Full
Absolute favorite of all times. Every person who wants to form an opinion about the essence of war should read this.
War is hell. But it exists, so what are the codes we can assemble to judge it by?
A must read for anyone concerned with the morality of war . and in war.
Feb 20, 2019Ahmed alrajhi rated it did not like it
Had to read for my exam, not something I would typically pick up but was a great read despite nothing I revised coming up in the end.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.Be the first to start one »
Recommend It | Stats | Recent Status Updates
See similar books…
See top shelves…
64followers
Michael Walzer is a Jewish American political philosopher and public intellectual. A professor emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, he is editor of the political-intellectual quarterly Dissent. He has written books and essays on a wide range of topics, including just and unjust wars, nationalism, ethnicity, economic justice, social criticism, radicalism, tolerance.more
More quizzes & trivia.
“Bfore Venus, censorious; before Mars, timid.” — 0 likes
“Before Venus, censorious; before Mars, timid.” — 0 likes
More quotes…